Teguh Adiprasetyo, Indra Cahyadinata


This study aims to determine the commodities which have comparative and competitive advantages and develop strategies for regional economic development based on superior commodities in the district. Several methods are used for research analysis, namely Location Quotient and Differential Shift analysis, Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process, SWOT analysis and Interpretive Structural Modeling. The results showed that the identification and determination of economic sectors that have comparative and competitive advantages that can drive regional economic growth are 1) agriculture, forestry and fisheries, and 2) processing industries. While commodities that have comparative and competitive advantages include 20 commodities with the first rank as the superior commodity is coffee. Regional economic development strategies based on superior coffee commodities can be implemented using several strategies that have large leverage, namely 1) Increasing capital support by the government through credit provision by financial institutions and banks, 2) Institutional development and increased institutional cooperation in the process coffee production and marketing of products by utilizing the availability of existing partners, and 3) Increasing knowledge and competence of business farmers through trainings so that production can increase. 

Keywords:  superior commodity, AHP, regional economics, strategy

Teks Lengkap:



Arafah, W. and R.C.D. Matheos. 2017. Determining factors of potential economy sectors of Bantaeng Regency in South Slawesi Province of Indonesia: an analysis using the Location Quotient approach. International Journal of Business and Management 12 (7):183-191.

Chang, D.Y. 1996. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research 95:649-655.

David, F.R. and F.R. David. 2017. Strategic Management: Concept and Cases – a competitive advantage approach. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, England.

Djakapermana, R. D. 2010. Pengembangan Wilayah Melalui Pendekatan Kesisteman. IPB Press, Bogor.

Eriyatno. 2003. Ilmu Sistem: Meningkatkan Mutu dan Efektifitas Manajemen. IPB Press, Bogor.

Eryatno and L. Larasati. 2013. Ilmu sistem: meningkatkan integrasi dan koordinasi manajemen. Center for System and Penerbit Guna Widya, Surabaya.

Hendayani, R. 2003. Aplikasi metode Location Quotients (LQ) dalam penentuan komoditas unggulan nasional. Informatika Pertanian 12:1-21.

Kanungo S., Bhatnagar V.K. 2002. Beyond generic models for information system quality, the use of Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM). System Research 19: 531-549.

Marimin. 2008. Teknik dan Aplikasi Pengambilan Keputusan Kriteria Majemuk. Grasindo, Jakarta.

Montibeller, G. and A. Franco. 2010. Multi-criteria decision analysis for strategic decision making, In C. Zopounidis and P.M. Pardolos (Eds), Handbook of multicriteria analysis. Springer, Hiedelberg.

Rigby, D. and D. Cáreres. 2001. Organic farming and the sustainability of agricultural systems, Agricultural Systems 68:21-40.

Rustiadi, E., dan S. Hadi. 2004. Pengembangan Agropolitan sebagai Strategi Pembangunan Perdesaan dan Pembangunan Berimbang. Workshop dan Seminar Nasional Pengembangan Agropolitas sebagai Strategi Pembangunan Perdesaan dan Pembangunan Berimbang. Bogor

Rustiadi, E., S. Hadi, dan W. M. Ahmad. 2006. Kawasan Agropolitan: Konsep Pembangunan Desa-Kota Berimbang. Crespent Press Kampus IPB Baranangsiang P4W-LPPM IPB. Bogor.

Saaty, T.L. and L.G. Vargas. 2012. Models, methods, concepts, and applications of the analytical hierarchy process. Springer, Hiedelberg.

Saxena J.P., Sushil, P. Vrat. 1992. Hierarchy and classification of program plan elements using Interpretive Structural Modeling: a case study of energy conservation in the Indian Cement Industry. System Practice 5(6):651-670.

Stein, A.W. 2003. Strategic management for public and nonprofit organizations. Marcel Dekker Inc, New York.

Tarigan, R. 2005. Ekonomi Regional: Teori dan Aplikasi. Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Zeleny, M. 2011. MCDM: in search of new paradigms. In Shi, Y., S. Wang, G. Kou, J. Wallenius (Eds). New state of MCDM in the 21st century – Selected papers of the 20th International Conference on Multiple Criteria Decision Making 2009. Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin.


  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.