EVALUATION OF SPBE SERVICE MATURITY LEVEL IN CENTRAL MALUKU DISTRICT GOVERNMENT USING SPBE 2020 FRAMEWORK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33387/jiko.v6i1.5422Abstract
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) utilization in the implementation of government processes is a priority that the government continues to develop. To make it happen, the government, through Presidential Decree No. 95 of 2018 concerning the implementation of an electronic-based government system (SPBE), every government agency must implement SPBE in its services and evaluate the implementation of SPBE periodically. With this urgency, the government issued Panrb Regulation No. 59 of 2020 concerning guidelines for assessing the maturity level of SPBE to correct deficiencies in the previous Panrb Regulation No. 5 of 2018 because there were several mandates of Presidential Regulation No. 95 of 2018 that had not been accommodated in it. One of the domains that received changes is the SPBE Service domain. In the SPBE service domain, there are updates to the assessment questionnaire and the addition of indicators that were originally 11 service indicators to 16 maturity-level service indicators. The purpose of this study is to determine the maturity level of SPBE services using the SPBE 2020 framework through the assessment of aspects of electronic-based Government Administration Services and the value of electronic-based Public Service aspects in Central Maluku regency. The Data in this study were obtained through interviews, observation, and validation of supporting evidence. The results of this study indicate the value of the SPBE Service Domain index of 2.36. The result of this value is used as an assessment of the maturity level of SPBE services in the Central Maluku regency government. From the acquisition of the index value, the maturity level of SPBE services in the Central Maluku regency government is included in the “average†category. To improve the indicators of low-value SPBE services, the Central Maluku regency government needs to implement the improvement recommendations that have been given.
References
[2] B. Ibikunle, P. Policy, and M. Process, “E-government. LASU Journal of Management Sciences,†no. November, 2020.
[3] M. Alshehri and S. Drew, “E-Government Fundamentals Author E-GOVERNMENT FUNDAMENTALS,†Proc. IADIS Int. Conf. ICT, Soc. Hum. Beings 2010, pp. 35–42, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au/bitstream/handle/10072/37709/67525_1.pdf
[4] Presiden Republik Indonesia, “Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik,†2018.
[5] Pemerintah Indonesia, “Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 5 Tahun 2018 tentang Pedoman Evaluasi Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik,†2018.
[6] Pemerintah Indonesia, “Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara Dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 59 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pemantauan Dan Evaluasi Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik,†2020.
[7] Hulukati, S. A. (2018). Evaluasi Penerapan Cobit 5 Pada Layanan Pengadaan Secara Elektronik (LPSE) Di Provinsi Gorontalo. METIK JURNAL, 2(1), 40-45.
[8] Aini, S. N. (2021). Evaluasi sistem Layanan Aspirasi dan Pengaduan Online Rakyat (LAPOR) di Kantor Kecamatan Cibiru Kota Bandung . Thesis. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
[9] D. Setiawan Putra, S. Selo, and S. Fauziati, “Evaluasi Domain Manajemen Spbe Pemerintah Kota Yogyakarta Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri Pan-Rb Nomor 59 Tahun 2020,†JIKO (Jurnal Inform. dan Komputer), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2022, doi: 10.33387/jiko.v5i1.4265.
[10] S. Khanra and R. P. Joseph, “E-Governance Maturity Models: A Meta-ethnographic Study,†Int. Technol. Manag. Rev., vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1, 2019, doi: 10.2991/itmr.b.190417.001.
[11] A. N. Rahmadi, M. Jibril, and A. Muhammad, “Implementasi E-Government Kota Probolinggo ( Studi Peraturan Presiden Nomor 95 Tahun 2018 Tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik ),†J. Ilmu Adm. Negara, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1–11, 2021.
[12] I. M. Sukarsa., I. B. A. Paramartha., A. A. K. A. Cahyawan., K. S. Wibawa., P. G. A. S. Yasa., N. M. S. Wulanyani., N. W. Wisswani. 2020. “Evaluation of E-Government Maturity Models in Sub-District Public Services in Indonesia Using the SPBE Framework,†J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 4. no. 2, pp.
[13] Nurlan, F. Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif. CV. Pilar Nusantara,2019.
[14] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2018.
[15] E. D. Kartiningrum, “Panduan Penyusunan Studi Literatur,†Lemb. Penelit. dan Pengabdi. Masy. Politek. Kesehat. Majapahit, Mojokerto, pp. 1–9, 2015.
