Peer Review Process

1. Articles that are submitted (submitted) will be selected by the Editor, especially checking the suitability of the manuscript with the scope of the journal, conformity with the Journal template and the level of similarity of the manuscript. decline.

2. Articles that meet step 1 above will be forwarded to 2 reviewers for their content to be reviewed using the blind review method The review process will take into account.

3. The review process will consider the paper's contribution, originality, abstract feasibility, systematic clarity and presentation of the paper, completeness and updating of the literature, grammar of paper writing and others deemed important by the reviewer.

4. Reviewers will suggest improvements and or accept/reject articles.

5. The editor will decide by considering suggestions from reviewers whether the manuscript meets the requirements of JIKO (Journal of Informatics and Computers)

6. If the decision is that the manuscript needs revision, the author must correct the manuscript according to the recommendations of the reviewers and editors. and re-upload the script.

7. Editor again checks whether the manuscript is appropriate or not. if it is not appropriate then the editor returns the manuscript to the author for revision.

8. Editor's decision is final