Limitation Of Judicial Review Authority by Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Regarding Criminal Provisions in Laws

Amriyanto Amriyanto, Rafika Nur

Abstract


Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 46/PUU-XIV/2016 which rejects the extension of meaning and scope of adultery, rape and fornication in Indonesian criminal law becomes polemic in society. This is because the acts are very contrary to the moral and religious values, and Pancasila as the ideology of the Indonesian nation. The limitation of judicial review authority by Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia related to criminal provisions is the reason for not willing to take the exclusive authority of the legislator in the formulation of criminal provisions. On the other hand, the Constitutional Court itself often extends the meaning and scope of norms in laws unrelated to criminal provisions.

Keywords


Constitutional Court; Judicial Review; Criminal Provisions

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrade, G. F. d. (2001). Comparative Constitutional Law. Judicial Review. Journal of Constitutional Law, 3(3), 977-989. http://www.pennjournalconlaw.com/

Barber, N. W. (2003). The Rechtsstaatand The Rule of Law. University of Toronto Lawjournal, 53(4), 443-454. doi: 10.2307/3650895

Bemmelen, J. M. V. (1968 ). Het Materiele Strafrecht, 3e Herziene druk, Tjeenk Willink/Haarlem, Translate by Hasnan (1979) Hukum Pidana I, Hukum Pidana Materil Bagian Umum. Bandung: Bina Cipta.

Bentham, J. (1979). The Theory of Lesilation. Translate by Nurhadi, N.M. (2006) Teori Perundang-Undangan Prinsip-Prinsip Legislasi, Hukum Perdata dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Nusamedia and Nuansa.

Bentham, J. (2000). Principles of Morals and Legislation. Kitchener: Batoche Books.

Billis, E. (2016). The European Court of Justice: A “Quasi-Constitutional Court†in Criminal Matters? The Taricco Judgment and Its Shortcomings. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 7(1), 20-38. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/203228441600700103

Charles. (2017). Pendidikan Multikultural sehingga memperkuat Kohesifitas Persatuan dan Kesatuan Bangsa. Journal of Educational Studies, 2(1), 30-46.

Daroeso, B. (1986). Dasar dan Konsep Pendidikan Moral Pancasila. Surabaya: Aneka Ilmu.

Fuady, M. (2014). Teori-Teori Besar (Grand Theory) Dalam Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenandamedia Group.

Garth, K. (November 2011). A Dictionary of Philosophical Terms and Names". Philosophy Pages. According to Immanuel Kant and Richard Mervyn Hare...moral imperatives must be regarded as equally binding on everyone.

George, G. D. a. R. P. (2017). Natural Law Jurisprudence. USA: Cambridge University Press.

Kelsen, H. (1961). General Theory of Law and State. Translated by Anders Wedberg. New York: Russekk & Russell.

Kommers, D. P. (1994). The Constitutional Law of Abortion in Germany: Should Americans Pay Attention? Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 10(1), 1-32.

Lailam, T. (2015). Pro-Kontra Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menguji Undang-Undang yang Mengatur Eksistensinya. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(4), 795-824.

Lamintang, P. A. F. (1983). Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Bandung: Sinar Baru.

Lestari, G. (2015). Bhinnekha Tunggal Ika: Khasanah Multikultural Indonesia di Tengah Kehidupan Sara. Jurnal Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 28(1), 31-37. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jppkn.v28i1.5437

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Putusan Nomor 1-2/PUU-XII/2014 (tanggal 13 Februari 2014).

Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Putusan Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006 (tanggal 23 Agustus 2006).

Mahkamah Konstiusi Republik Indonesia Putusan Nomor 46/PUU-XIV/2016 (tanggal 14 Desember 2017).

Mclnerny, R. (1987). Aquinas's Moral Theory. Journal of Medical Ethics, British Medical Journal Publishing Group Ltd Indiana, USA, 13(1), 31-33.

Rehnquist, W. H. (1989). The Supreme Court: How It Was How It Is. New York: William Marrow.

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, The Definition of Morality. First published Wed Apr 17, 2002; substantive revision Mon Feb 8, 2016. Retrieved 2 Januari 2018, from https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/spr2015/entries/morality-definition/

Sudarto. (1983). Hukum dan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Alumni.

Sweet, A. S. (2003). Why Europe Rejected American Judicial Review and Why it May Not Matter. Yale Law School Legal Scholarship Repository 1(1), 2744-2780.

Tate, C. N. Constitutional Law: Judicial review. Retrieved 2 Januari 2018, from https://www.britannica.com

Thaysen, J. D. (2015). Defining Legal Moralism. SATS Northern European Journal of Philosophy, 16(2), 179-201. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/sats-2014-0013




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33387/klj.v2i1.1880

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Khairun Law Journal



 

Creative Commons License
Khairun Law Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Editorial Official :

Faculty of Law, Khairun University.
Jusuf Abdulrahman, Campus II, Gambesi, Ternate City, North Maluku Indonesia.
Klj@unkhair.ac.id, WhatsApp: +6281343974566

SUPPORTED BY

slot gacor slot gacor hari ini slot gacor 2025 demo slot pg slot gacor slot gacor