Handling of Violent Crimes Between Community Groups in Ternate Conducted by the Police

Authors

  • Muhammad Rizkal Kunio PERADI Advocates & Postgraduate Students of the Law Study Program at Khairun University
  • Ridjal Junaidi Kotta Faculty of Law, Khairun University
  • Nam Rumkel Master of Law Study Program Postgraduate Program Khairun University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33387/klj.v2i2.1900

Keywords:

Crime, Group Violence, Police

Abstract

Efforts to tackle crime in general can be divided into two, namely the path of punishment (criminal law) and through non-punishment (not / outside of criminal law). The two pathways can be distinguished that, with efforts to overcome through the penalty line more focused on the repressive nature (oppression / eradication / suppression) after the crime occurred, while the non-penal route is more focused on the nature of the prefentive (prevention / deterrence / control) before the crime occurred. This research was conducted to find out what are the factors causing the occurrence of acts of violence between community groups in Toboko and Mangga Dua in Ternate City as well as the form of handling conducted by the Police Resort of Ternate on the issue. The results of the research in the field found that there were 2 (two) factors that caused violence between Toboko and Mangga Dua groups, namely group factors and individual factors, while the form of handling undertaken by the Ternate Resort Police was by taking preventive measures and repression.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Books:

Andi Hamzah. (2008). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika.

Barda Nawawi Arief. (2010). Kebijakan Legislatif Dalam Penaggulangan Kejahatan Dengan Pidana Penjara. Yogyakarta : Genta Publishing.

_______, (2011). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana (Perkembangan Penyusunan Konsep KUHP Baru). (Cetakan Ketiga). Jakarta : Kencana.

Gerry Van Klinken. (2007). Perang Kota Kecil : Kekerasan Komunal dan Demokrasi di Indonesia. Jakarta : Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

I.S. Susanto. (2011). Statistika Kriminal Sebagai Konstruksi Sosial. Yogyakarta : Genta Publishing.

J.E. Sahetapy. (2009). Ancaman Pidana Mati Terhadap Pembunuhan Berencana.Malang : Setara Press

Moeljatno. (2009). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.

Novri Susan. (2012). Negara Gagal Mengelolah Konflik (Demokrasi dan Tata Kelolah Konflik di Indonesia). Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

Satjipto Rahardjo & Anton Tabah. (1993). Polisi Pelaku dan Pemikir. Jakarta : Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Sean M. Sheehan. (2014). Anarkisme : Perjalanan Sebuah Gerakan Perlawanan. Tanggerang : Margin Kiri.

Syafuan Rozi. (et.al.,). (2006). Kekerasan Komunal: Anatomi dan Resolusi Konflik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

Waluyadi. (1999). Pengetahuan Dasar Hukum Acara Pidana.Bandung : Mandar Maju

Yesmil Anwar & Adang. (2010). Krimiologi. Bandung : Refika Aditama.

Journals:

Arthur Josias Simon Ruturambi. (2009). “Wacana Kejahatan dan Referensi Kebudayaanâ€Â. Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia. Vol. V. No. II

Badrun Susantyo.(2011).“Memahami Perilaku Agresifâ€Â. Jurnal Informasi. No. 3. Vol. 16. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial.Jakarta : Kementerian Sosial Republik Indonesia

Muhammad Syawaludin. “Memaknai Konflik Dalam Perspektif SosiologiMelalui Pendekatan Konflik Fungsionalâ€Â.Jurnal Sosial. Program Studi Sejarah dan Kebudayaan IslamFakultas Adab dan Budaya Islam. Palembang :UIN Raden Fatah Palembang

Research Result:

Suwarno. (et.al.,). (2012). Analisis Perilaku Kekerasan Massa dan Upaya Penanggulangannya. Hasil Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat – Dies Natalis FISIP Unila : Lampung.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-22