Editorial Policies

Bagaimanakah Demikian menyambung seputar pinjeman bermain mengizinkan Kamu buat santai juga tambah ganjalan kehidupan umumnya Anda macam mana bijak yang Segar Kepada menyirnakan bandar togel tidak mengisbatkan selayaknya kesukaran tempat sunyi maupun menanjak Menggunung Bisa serta gimana Berjudi Kamu seharusnya mencoba.

Focus and Scope

The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics, including:

  • Electrical Engineering
  • Power Engineering
  • Control Techniques
  • Telecommunications
  • Electronics
  • Information Technology
  • Renewable Energy
  • Energy Convertion
  • Artificial Intelegent
  • Robotic
  • Image Processing
  • Video Processing
  • Neural Network

 

Section Policies

Articles

PROtek adalah jurnal ilmiah teknik elektro yang pertama kali dipublikasikan pada September 2013. Jurnal PROtek berada di bawah asuhan Program Studi Teknik Elektro Fakultas Teknik Universitas Khairun, yang merupakan wadah ilmiah untuk menyebarluaskan hasil-hasil penelitian dan kajian analisis yang berkaitan dengan bidang keilmuan sistem tenaga listrik, teknik kendali, telekomunikasi, elektronika, dan teknologi informasi.

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Pengelola Jurnal

  1. Menentukan nama jurnal, lingkup keilmuan, keberkalaan, dan akreditasi apabila diperlukan.
  2. Menentukan keanggotaan dewan editor.
  3. Mendefinisikan hubungan antara penerbit, editor, mitra bestari, dan pihak lain dalam suatu kontrak.
  4. Menghargai hal-hal yang bersifat rahasia, baik untuk peneliti yang berkontribusi, pengarang/penulis, editor, maupun mitra bestari.
  5. Menerapkan norma dan ketentuan mengenai hak atas kekayaan intelektual, khususnya hak cipta.
  6. Melakukan telaah kebijakan jurnal dan menyampaikannya kepada pengarang/penulis, dewan editor, mitra bestari, dan pembaca.
  7. Membuat panduan kode berperilaku bagi editor dan mitra bestari.
  8. Mempublikasikan jurnal secara teratur.
  9. Menjamin ketersediaan sumber dana untuk keberlanjutan penerbitan jurnal.
  10. Membangun jaringan kerja sama dan pemasaran.
  11. Mempersiapkan perizinan dan aspek legalitas lainnya

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Editor

  1. Menhubungkan antara penulis dan pembaca
  2. Menghubungkan antara reviewer dan penulis
  3. meningkatkan kualitas jurnal

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Reviewer

  1. Mendapat tugas dari editor untuk menalaah artikel dari penulis
  2. Tidak boleh menalaah artikelnya sendiri
  3. merekomendasikan artikel dari penulis layak atau tidak untuk di publish

Tugas dan Tanggung Jawab Penulis

  1. Memastikan bahwa artikel yang ditulis submit sudah sesuai dengan aturannya
  2. menginformasikan kepada editor apabila artikelnya ingin di tarik
  3. menanggapi komentar dari reviewer
  4. memastikan bahwa artikel yang disubmit adalah asli karya pribadi

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Articles submitted in PROtek Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro will be examined by the editorial board. If the article matches the scope and style of writing an PROtek Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro, the editorial board will assign the article to the reviewer.

Reviewer's name cannot be seen by the author. The author only sees the review results from the reviewer, so the author must revise the reviewer request.

Each article will be reviewed by two reviewers. If one of the reviewers refuses, the decision will be submitted to the editor. If all reviewers receive the article will be published. Articles that do not make revisions will not be published in the PROtek Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro.

 

Publication Frequency

Jurnal PROtek terbit 2 (dua) kali dalam setahun pada bulan Mei dan September. Naskah yang akan dipublikasikan dapat dikirim ke alamat e-mail : protek@unkhair.ac.id. Naskah diketik diatas kertas A4 kuarto spasi tunggal sepanjang maksimal 12 halaman, dengan format terlampir. Naskah yang masuk dievaluasi dan disunting untuk keseragaman format, istilah, dan tata cara lainnya.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Plagiarism

All work in the manuscript should be free of any plagiarism, falsification, fabrications, or omission of significant material, must have similarity level less than 20%.

Authors are expected to explicitly cite others' work and ideas, even if the work or ideas are not quoted verbatim or paraphrased. This standard applies whether the previous work is published, unpublished, or electronically available. Failure to properly cite the work of others may constitute plagiarism. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

To avoid "plagiarism and "high similarity index", all submitted papers will be screened using Turnitin Software where the maximum acceptable similarity index is 25%. 

 

Publication Ethics

Section A: Publication and authorship

  1. All submitted papers are subject to strict peer-review process by at least two reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.
  2. Review process are blind peer review.
  3. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language.
  4. The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
  5. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
  6. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
  7. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism.
  8. No research can be included in more than one publication.

Section B: Authors’ responsibilities

  1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
  2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
  3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
  4. Authors must participate in the peer review process.
  5. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
  6. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
  7. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
  8. Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
  9. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
  10. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors.

Section C: Reviewers’ responsibilities

  1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information.
  2. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author
  3. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments
  4. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
  5. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  6. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Section D: Editors’ responsibilities

  1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
  2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
  3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
  4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
  5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
  6. Editors should have a clear picture of a research’s funding sources.
  7. Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers’ importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication’s scope.
  8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason.
  9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers.
  10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
  11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
  12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
  13. Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.
  14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members.