Editorial Policies

Bagaimanakah Demikian menyambung seputar pinjeman bermain mengizinkan Kamu buat santai juga tambah ganjalan kehidupan umumnya Anda macam mana bijak yang Segar Kepada menyirnakan bandar togel tidak mengisbatkan selayaknya kesukaran tempat sunyi maupun menanjak Menggunung Bisa serta gimana Berjudi Kamu seharusnya mencoba.

Focus and Scope

The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics, including : Electrical and Power Engineering, Smartgrids Technologies & Applications, Power Systems and Applications, Power Electronics and Drives, Circuits and Electronics, Automation, Instrumentation and Control Engineering, Digital Signal, Image and Video Processing, Telecommunication System and Technology, Computer Science and Information Technology, Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, Internet of Things, Big Data and Cloud Computing

 

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

The process can be described as follow.

  1. The submitted manuscript is first reviewed by an editor. It will be evaluated whether it is suitable for the PROtek : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro focus and scope or has a major methodological flaw and similarity score by using Turnitin. The decision is rejected or accepted for a review process.
  2. The manuscript will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (Single Blind Review). Reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for necessary actions and responses.
  3. Afterward, the editorial team meeting suggested the final decision to the revised manuscript by authors.
  4. Finally, the Editor will send the final decision to the corresponding author.
  5. The accepted manuscript then continued to the copyediting and layout editing process to prepare the camera-ready paper.

Review Outcomes

Utilizing feedback from the peer review process, the Editor will make a final publication decision. The review process will take approximately 8 to 14 weeks. Decisions categories include:

  • Reject - Rejected manuscripts will not be published and authors will not have the opportunity to resubmit a revised version of the manuscript to PROtek : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro.
  • Accept with Major Revision - Manuscript will be review again after some major modifications are made.
  • Accept with Minor Revisions - Manuscripts receiving an accept-pending-revisions decision will be published in PROtek : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro under the condition that minor modifications are made. Revisions will be reviewed by an editor to ensure necessary updates are made prior to publication.
  • Accept - Accepted manuscripts will be published in the current form with no further modifications required

 

Publication Frequency

This journal is published 3 times a year January, May and September. .

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Academic ethics are the necessary fundamental principle of research and the foundation for scientists’ and engineers’ reputation. PROtek are peer-reviewed international journals. This statement clarifies ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in our journals, including the authors, the editors, the peer-reviewer­­­­­s, The Editorial Board is responsible for, among others, preventing publication malpractice. Unethical behavior is unacceptable, and the PROtek does not tolerate plagiarism in any form. Authors who submitted articles: affirm that manuscript contents are original. Furthermore, the authors’ submission also implies that the manuscript has not been published previously in any language, either wholly or partly, and is not currently submitted for publication elsewhere. Editors, authors, and reviewers, within the PROtek, are to be fully committed to good publication practice and accept the responsibility for fulfilling the following duties and responsibilities, as set by the (COPE) Code of Conduct for Journal Editors. As part of the Core Practices, COPE has written guidelines on the http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines. :

1. Publication and authorship
• All the published papers should list the references and financial support according to PROtek style.
• Forbidden plagiarism and fraudulent date.
• Forbidden to publish the same research in more than one journal
• Forbidden to publish the same research in different languages
 
2. Author’s duty
• Original papers should report the work performed and the experiment data accurately, discuss its significance objectively, give experiment details enough to reproduce the research or experiment by others, and cite and list the references exactly according to the PROtek requirement and PROtek reference style. 
• Data access and retention: The raw data of the research should be available even after the paper’s publication for at least ten years.
• Originality and plagiarism: Only entirely original papers can be submitted to PROtek. All the work or words of others should be cited or quoted appropriately. Plagiarism and fraudulent date papers will not be considered for publication by PROtek. 
• Multiple, redundant or concurrent publication: Papers should not be published in more than one journal. Submitting the same research in different languages and the under-review manuscripts to different journals are also unethical behavior, which are unacceptable by PROtek. 
• Sign the PROtek Copyright form and statement that all data in article are real and authentic.
• Authorship of the paper: All authors should have significantly contributed to the research.
• Participate in the peer review process
• Ethics of experimentation: Approval from the relevant body is required for the studies, such as humans, animals, cell lines, field sampling, and potential biosafety implications. 
• Disclosure and conflicts of Interest: All the financial support for the research should be disclosed.
• All authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
• Acknowledgement of sources
 
3. Reviewers’ responsibility
•Judgments should be objective. 
•Reviewers’ views should be expressed clearly with supporting arguments.
•Promptness is necessary. If the selected reviewer feels inadequate to review the paper or cannot promptly review the paper, the reviewer should inform the editor and drop out of the peer review process of the paper.
•Reviewers should have no conflict of interest with respect to the research, the authors, and/or the research funders.
•Reviewers should point out relevant published work which is not yet cited.
•Reviewed articles should be treated confidentially.
 
4. Editorial responsibilities
•Publication decisions: Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article. But this decision should only be based on the paper’s relevance to the journal’s scope and its academic quality, including the reviewers’ judgments, the research’s innovation, the experiment’s validity, etc. And only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
•Confidentiality: Editors and the editorial staff should guarantee the confidentiality of the submitted papers which should be only disclose to the authors, the reviewers, the potential reviewers, the adviser from the PROtek Editorial Committee, and the publisher if necessary before publication. And the submitted papers should not be used for the editors’ and the editorial staff’s own research without the authors’ written authorization.  
•Editors should have no conflict of interest with respect to articles they reject/accept.
•Adhere to the double-blind review in the peer review process.
•Preserve anonymity of reviewers.
•When errors are found, promote publication of correction or retraction.
 
5. Publishing ethics issues
•No plagiarism and no fraudulent data.
Plagiarism and fraudulent data are forbidden. When a case of plagiarism and fraudulent data is exposed after the paper’s publication in PROtek, a preliminary investigation will be conducted by PROtek. PROtek will also inform the author. The author could state the situation through PROtek official e-mail: protek@unkhair.ac.id If the plagiarism is confirmed, PROtek will contact the author’s institute and funding agencies. And PROtek will mark the plagiarism paper obviously on the PDF of this paper or formally retract the paper.
•Monitoring/safeguarding publishing ethics by editorial board.
Crosscheck and double-blind peer review should be conducted for each paper to avoid academic misconduct. And all the files related to each paper should be kept properly.
•Guidelines for retracting articles.
(a) Retracting article will be considered if there is clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or honest error (e.g. miscalculation or experimental error), or if the findings have previously been published elsewhere without proper crossreferencing, permission or justification (i.e. cases of redundant publication), or if the paper constitutes plagiarism, or if the paper reports unethical research. 
(b) The main purpose of retractions is to correct the literature and ensure its integrity rather than to punish authors who misbehave.
(c) The retracted paper will not be removed from the PROtek online issues. But notices of retraction will be promptly published and linked to the retracted article, accurately stating the information of the retracted article, the reason(s) for retraction, and who retracts the article, which will be freely available to all readers.
(d) Articles may be retracted by their author(s) or by PROtek. In some cases, retractions are issued jointly. And PROtek has the final decision about retracting articles. PROtek will retract publications even if all or some of the authors refuse to retract the publication themselves if the unethical behavior is confirmed.
•Maintain the integrity of the academic record.
All the authors will make a commitment of the integrity of the academic record, including the integrity of the data and figures in the paper, when they sign the PROtek Copyright Form. And the crosscheck and peer review will help the editors to verify the originality and integrity of the submitted paper. 
•All the business needs should be precluded from compromising intellectual and ethical standards.
•Dealing with the fundamental errors. 
When an author discovers fundamental errors in the published works, it is the author’s obligation to notify the editor promptly by e-mail. The editors and the editorial stuff should always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies when needed

 

Policy of Plagiarism Detection

The peer-review process is at the heart of scientific publishing. As part of PROtek commitment to protecting the integrity of the scholarly record, PROtek feels a strong obligation to support the scientific community in all aspects of research and publishing ethics. All submitted manuscripts must be free from plagiarism contents. All authors are suggested to use plagiarism detection software to do the similarity checking before submitting their manuscript to the journal (please use iThenticate or Turnitin to check the similarity). Editors will also check the similarity of manuscripts in this journal by using Turnitin or iThenticate software. The manuscript will instantly be rejected if there is plagiarism indicated or detected. The final camera ready also will be checked again for similarity rate. The overall similarity rate of a manuscript should not exceed 25 percent, and the similarity rate to a single source should not exceed 10 percent