Kebijakan Editorial

Fokus dan Ruang Lingkup

Cannarium is a journal of agricultural sciences. It is a peer-reviewed, scientific journal published by Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Khairun Indonesia. Cannarium journal aims at publishing original, scientifically research articles and article review that describe and explain a wide range of agricutural fields and disciplines including Agronomy, Horticulture, plant breeding, plant protection, Agribusiness, Agroindustry, Food Science, Soil Science, Forestry and Environmental Sciences, bioenergy, Animal Husbandary and other pertinent related to tropical islands-based biodiversity, agricultural sustainability and ecosystem services. The applications of new molecular, microscopic and analytical techniques to understanding and explaining population and community dynamics is also of great interest. Cannarium is published twice a year in both print and online versions.

 

Kebijakan Bagian

Articles

Centang Naskah Terbuka Centang Diindeks Centang Telah di-Peer review
 

Frekuensi Penerbitan

Cannarium is published twice a year (June and December) in both print and online versions.

 

Publication Ethics

This publication ethics is based on COPE’s Core Practices. The ethics of this publication were developed to avoid violations in research and publishing. The ethics of this publication explains the ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing scientific articles at Cannarium Journal

 

Publication Frequency

Published 2 times a year: June and December

 

Open Access Policy

Cannarium Journal provides direct open access to its content with the principle that making research freely available to the public supports greater global knowledge exchange.

 

Author Fees

Cannarium Journal charges the following author fees.

Article publication fees: 550,000.00 (IDR) per printed article up to 4 pages. Additional page will be charged 100,000 (IDR) per printed page without color photo(s). Color photo(s) page entirely the responsibility by authors per printed page.

If this paper is accepted for publication, you will be asked to pay an article publication fee to cover publication costs.

 

Peer Review Process

The suitability of manuscripts for publication in Cannarium (Can Journal) is judged by peer reviewers and the Cannarium Editorial Board. All the review processes are conducted in a blind review. Chief Editor handles all correspondence with the author and makes the final decision as to whether the paper is recommended for acceptance, rejection, or needs to be returned to the author for revision.

1. The author should follow the manuscript format determined by Cannarium Template.

2. Once, the manuscript pass the administrative screening, Chief Editor and Associate Editor will evaluate the submitted papers on the prequalification review for suitability of further review process.

3. In this step, a manuscript could be rejected without a review process, due to three general reasons:

  • The topic of the manuscript does not fit in the Cannarium scope and may be better suited for publication elsewhere.
  • The substance of the manuscripts does not meet Cannarium standards; the data may be incomplete; the methodology used is not appropriate; lack of novelties and no advancement of the existing knowledge; or there are no consistency among objectives, research design/method, evidence, and conclusion.
  • The manuscripts are not written following Cannarium guidelines mentioned in the instruction of the author

4. Once the manuscript meets the prequalification requirement, the manuscripts will be sent to two or three qualified peer reviewers selected by Chief Editor and Associate Editors.

5. The peer reviewers should examine the manuscript and return it with their recommendation, comment, and suggestion to the Chief Editor within 3 weeks since the review request is being accepted.  In case, one of the peer reviewers recommends rejection, and on the contrary, another reviewer recommends revision, the Chief Editor will ask a third reviewer or Board Editors to decide the acceptance or rejection of the paper.

6. Papers needing revision will be returned to the authors, and the author must return the revised manuscript to the Chief Editor via OJS of Cannarium within 3 weeks since notice/email from the Chief Editor in accepted. Manuscripts that exceed the revision deadline will be withdrawn. The authors may request an extension to Chief Editor before the revision expires.

7. For a manuscript in which a peer reviewer requests a revision checking made by the authors, the revised manuscript will be sent to the peer reviewers upon request.  In this step, the peer reviewers should re-examine the revised manuscript and return it with their recommendation, comment, and suggestion to the Chief Editor within 3 weeks since the review request is being accepted.

8. Further, Chief Editor will send the revised manuscript to Associate Editors to check whether the manuscript is revised as suggested by peer reviewers.

9. Associate Editors could give a recommendation to Chief Editor that the manuscript should return to authors, should be accepted, or should be rejected within 2 weeks.

10. In this step, manuscripts could be rejected if authors do not revise the manuscripts as suggested by reviewers and/or Editorial Board, or do not give proper response/rebuttal against the suggestions.

11. If the manuscript is rejected, the author will be notified by the Chief Editor with a statement of reasons for rejection. The author may appeal to Chief Editor if he/she believes an unfair judgment has been made which encloses the authors’ reasons. Chief Editor will review and discuss the reasons with Associate Editor responsible for the manuscript, and later decide whether to accept or deny the appeal.

12. After acceptance by Chief Editors, the manuscript is forwarded to the technical editor to be the layout for the editorial board meetings. Chief Editor would send an acceptance letter announcing the publication issue attached with manuscript reprint to authors.