Fokus dan Ruang Lingkup

CLAPEYRON: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil adalah merupakan wadah ilmiah untuk menerbitkan hasil-hasil penelitian dan kajian analisis yang berkaitan dengan bidang teknik sipil dan Rekayasa

Kebijakan Bagian

Artikel

Naskah Terbuka

Diindeks

Telah di-Peer review

Proses Peer Review

1. Artikel yang di masukkan (disubmit) akan diseleksi oleh Editor terutama pengecekan kesesuaian naskah dengan ruang lingkup jurnal, kesesuaian dengan template Jurnal dan tingkat kesamaan naskah Dalam proses ini, editor akan menjalin komunikasi dengan penulis sehingga naskahnya layak dikirim ke Reviewer atau bahkan dikembalikan/decline.
2. Artikel yang memenuhi langkah 1 diatas akan diteruskan kepada Reviewer untuk ditinjau kontennya dengan metode blind review
3. Proses peninjauan akan mempertimbangkan kontribusi paper, originalitas, kelayakan abstrak, kejelasan sistematika dan penyajian paper, kelengkapan dan kemutakhiran pustaka, tata bahasa penulisan paper dan lain-lain yang dianggap penting oleh reviewer.
4. Reviewer akan menyarankan perbaikan dan atau penerimaan/menolak artikel.
5. Editor akan memutuskan dengan mempertimbangkan saran dari reviewer apakah naskahnya memenuhi persyaratan Clapeyron: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Sipil
   
6. Jika keputusannya adalah naskah dibutuhkan revisi maka penulis harus memperbaiki naskah sesuai yang rekomendasi reviewer dan editor. dan kembali meng-upload naskah.
7. Editor kembali memeriksa apakah naskah sudah sesuai atau belum. jika belum sesuai maka editor kembalikan lagi naskah kepada penulis untuk direvisi.
8. keputusan editor bersifat final

Kebijakan Akses Terbuka

Jurnal ini menyediakan akses terbuka yang pada prinsipnya membuat riset tersedia secara gratis untuk publik dan akan mensupport pertukaran pengetahuan global terbesar.

Pengarsipan

OJS sistem LOCKSS berfungsi sebagai sistem pengarsipan terdistribusi antar-perpustakaan yang menggunakan sistem ini dengan tujuan membuat arsip permanen (untuk preservasi dan restorasi). Lanjut...

PUBLICATION ETHICS

CLAPEYRON, is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and takes all possible measures against any publication malpractices. The Editorial Board is responsible for, among others, preventing publication malpractice. Unethical behavior is unacceptable, and the CLAPEYRON does not tolerate plagiarism in any form. Authors who submitted articles: affirm that manuscript contents are original. Furthermore, the authors’ submission also implies that the manuscript has not been published previously in any language, either wholly or partly, and is not currently submitted for publication elsewhere. Editors, authors, and reviewers, within the International Journal, are to be fully committed to good publication practice and accept the responsibility for fulfilling the following duties and responsibilities, as set by the COPE Code of Conduct for Journal Editors. As part of the Core Practices, COPE has written guidelines on the http://publicationethics.org/resources/guidelines.

Section B: Authors’ responsibilities

1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. 
4. Authors must participate in the peer-review process. 
5. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
6. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
7. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
8. Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
9. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
10. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors. 

Section C: Reviewers’ responsibilities

1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information. 
2. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author
3. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments
4. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
5. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
6. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers. 

Section D: Editors’ responsibilities

1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
6. Editors should have a clear picture of research’s funding sources.
7. Editors should base their decisions solely one the papers’ importance, originality, clarity and relevance to publication’s scope.
8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason. 
9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers. 
10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
13. Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.
14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewers and board members

PLAGIARISM CHECK

Authors should submit only original work that is not plagiarized and not has been published or being considered elsewhere. Turnitin will be used by the editorial team to check for simmiliarities of submitted manuscript with existing literatures 25 %.