Analysis of Junior High School Students’ Learning Outcomes on the Concept of Heat and Its Changes

Fatma Hamid, Sumarni Sahjat, Nurjana D Sehe, Iqbal Limatahu, Nurdin Abd Rahman, Halleyna Widyasari, Saprudin Saprudin

Sari


Students’ learning outcomes in the topic of heat and its changes are often limited by difficulties in understanding and analyzing thermal concepts. This study aims to analyze students’ learning outcomes based on four cognitive indicators: remembering (C1), understanding (C2), applying (C3), and analyzing (C4), as well as to identify individual student performance through two rounds of testing. This research used a descriptive quantitative approach involving 30 seventh-grade students, with six students selected as subjects for deeper analysis. Data were obtained through written tests administered twice and analyzed descriptively. The results showed that students achieved very good performance in the remembering indicator (95%) and good to very good performance in the understanding (75%) and applying indicators (80%). However, performance in the analyzing indicator remained low (60%), indicating that students’ higher-order cognitive skills are not yet adequately developed. Individual analysis further showed that most students fell into the fair category. The novelty of this study lies in the combined use of indicator-based and individual learning outcome analyses with repeated measurements, allowing a clearer picture of students’ cognitive strengths and weaknesses. Overall, these findings highlight the need for learning strategies that promote analytical thinking to improve student outcomes in the topic of heat and its changes.

Kata Kunci


Learning Outcomes, Heat Learning and Its Changes

Teks Lengkap:

PDF (English)

Referensi


S. Syamsuar, and R. Reflianto. “Pendidikan dan Tantangan Pembelajaran Berbasis Teknologi Informasi di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0.” E-Tech, vol. 6, no. 2, 2018, doi:10.24036/et.v2i2.101343.

E. Y. Wijaya, D. A. Sudjimat and A. Nyoto.” Transformasi pendidikan abad 21 sebagai tuntutan pengembangan sumber daya manusia di era global. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika Vol. 1, No. 26, 2016, pp. 263-278.

S. Sudarisman. “Memahami Hakikat Dan Karakteristik Pembelajaran Biologi Dalam Upaya Menjawab Tantangan Abad 21 Serta Optimalisasi Implementasi Kurikulum 2013.” Florea : Jurnal Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya, 2(1), 29–35. 2015. https://doi.org/10.25273/florea.v2i1.403

M. Thobroni and A. Mustofa. “Belajar dan Pembelajaran: Pengembangan wacana dan praktik pembelajran dalam pembangungan nasional.” Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media. 2013

Priyadi, R., Mustajab, A., Tatsar, M. Z., & Kusairi, S. (2018). Analisis kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa SMA kelas X MIPA dalam pembelajaran fisika. JPFT (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online), 6(1), 53-55.

H. R. Rizkia, et.al. “Hubungan Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru Dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 4 Kota Ternate Pada Konsep Getaran Dan Gelombang.” SAINTIFIK@: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 10(1). 2025. https://doi.org/10.33387/saintifik.v10i1.9799

Al-Fikry, I., Yusrizal, Y., & Syukri, M. (2018). Pengaruh Model Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Pada Materi Kalor. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 6(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v6i1.10776

Gazali, E. (2018). Pesantren di antara generasi alfa dan tantangan dunia pendidikan era revolusi industri 4.0. Oasis: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Islam, 2(2), 94–109.

Griffin, P., Care, E., & McGaw, B. (Eds.). (2015). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills: Methods and Approaches. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

Ennis, R. H. (2011). “Critical Thinking: Reflection and Perspective, Part I.” Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines, 26(1), 4–18

Liberna, H., & Nusantari, D. O. (2018). The influence of macromedia flash learning on the students’ mathematic concept understanding. Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 1-6.

Parlan, P., & Fernanda, O. D. (2021, March). Profile of 11th-grade students’ critical thinking skills in the reaction rate topic and their relationship with learning outcomes. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2330, No. 1). AIP Publishing.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. (59)

Karim, K., & Normaya, N. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Pembelajaran dalam Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Menggunakan Model Jucama di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1).

Sari, A. A., & Rusli, M. A. (2024). Analisis Hasil Belajar IPA Peserta Didik SMP pada Aspek Kognitif Level Menerapkan (C3) pada Materi Getaran, Gelombang dan Bunyi. 7.

Hatina, N., dkk (2023). Analisis Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pada Materi Kalor Dan Perpindahannya Di Smp Negeri 5 Kota Ternate. SAINTIFIK@: Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.33387/saintifik.v8i1.6222

Sintya, R. E. I., & Hidayatullah, M. M. S. (n.d.). Analisis Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Mata Pelajaran Fisika Kelas XI IPA Berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom Revisi. Reflection Journal, 5(1), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.36312/rj.v5i1.2819

A. Mafaza Kanzul Fikri, Sudarti, S., & Rif’ati Dina Handayani. (2022). Analisis Deskriptif Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (HOTS) Siswa MA Unggulan Nurul Iman Pokok Bahasan Suhu Dan Kalor dengan Menggunakan Taksonomi Bloom. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MIPA, 12(2), 214–219. https://doi.org/10.37630/jpm.v12i2.581

Hairun, Y. (n.d.). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Pada Materi Operasi Hitung Bilangan Bulat. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.33387/saintifik.v5i1.3641




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33387/saintifik.v10i2.10791

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Editorial Office:
Sultan Baabullah Airport Street, Campus-1 Universitas Khairun
Akehuda sub-district, North Ternate district, Ternate City 97728

Contact:
 saintifika@unkhair.ac.id
 +62 857 3577 5015 (Aji Saputra, M.Pd)
 +62 823 6233 7804 (Hutri Handayani Isra, M.Pd)