THE ROLE OF THE ELECTION SUPERVISORY BODY (BAWASLU) IN PREVENTING THE CRIMINAL ACT OF ELECTION CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA

Nuria Siswi Enggarani

Sari


Elections are the implementation of democratic practices in an orderly, systematic and organized manner. Election supervision is needed to ensure that elections are carried out democratically, so an organized and competent Election Supervisory Body is needed. The emergence of violations in the implementation of elections has damaged the democratic process so that the existence of the Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) must lead the supervision and implementation of election crime reports. According to this study, it should be noted that the presence of Bawaslu not only helps with election regulations, but also acts as a related party in cases of election disputes, to ensure elections are carried out correctly. In the future, Bawaslu's role must be maintained and even improved in order to maintain the quality of elections. This research aims to determine the role of the Election Supervisory Body (Bawaslu) in preventing corruption in Indonesian elections. Indonesia is a country that adheres to a democratic government system as intended in Article 1 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution, namely general elections as a means of exercising people's sovereignty which is realized directly, openly and fairly. Therefore, law helps resolve disputes or problems. It is hoped that the regional election process can maintain public confidence in the democratic system. Where corruption still occurs in the implementation of elections. This research method is described as a normative study of law and law using legal and conceptual approaches. The results of this research show that there are still many violations in the form of criminal acts of corruption and there are still many election debates that occur in the implementation of elections. The results of this research show that Bawaslu's role in preventing corruption in elections is considered not optimal. The formation of the Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Gakumdu) as a center for resolving election crimes is a repressive effort, but does not provide a deterrent effect for authors of corruption in the administration of elections. Therefore, the authors assess that prevention efforts are seen as a more effective effort to prevent corruption in the Indonesian regional elections. Therefore, it is important to realize fair elections by optimizing the role of Bawaslu in fostering an anti-corruption culture.

 


Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi


Airlangga, S. P. (2019). Hakikat Penguasa Dalam Negara Hukum Demokratis. Cepalo 3.1 , 1-10.

Akhmad, N. (2015). Pelanggaran Pemilu Legislatif di Kota Makassar Tahun 2014 (Analisis Yuridis UU. No. 8 Tahun 2012). Diss. Universitas Islam Negeri Alauddin Makassar.

Amal, B. (2019). Kewenangan Mengadili Oleh Bawaslu Atas Sengketa Proses Pemilu Yang Diatur Dalam Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum. Masalah-Masalah Hukum 48.3, 306-311.

Anggoro, S. A. (2019). Politik hukum: mencari sejumlah penjelasan. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 10.1, 77-86.

Anshar, S. (2019). Konsep Negara Hukum dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam . Soumatera Law Review 2.2 , 235-245.

Hum, M. H. (2020). Dinamika politik hukum di Indonesia. Kencana.

Ja’far, M. (2018). Eksistensi Dan Integritas Bawaslu Dalam Penanganan Sengketa Pemilu. Madani Legal Review 2.1, 59-70.

Jamaluddin. (2022). THE SETTLEMENT OF ELECTION DISPUTES BY BAWASLU REVIEWED FROM THE INDONESIAN JUSTICE SYSTEM. Interdisciplinary Social Studies 2.2 , 521-531.

Jimly, A. (2009). Menuju Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis. Jakarta : PT Bhuana Ilmu Populer.

Morissan. (2005). Hukum RI era Reformasi. Jakarta: Ramdina Prakarsa.

NN. (2021, Oktober 19). Riwayat Kasus Korupsi Komisioner KPU. Retrieved from CCN Indonesia: U, https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20200108185533-20-463596/riwayatkasus-korupsi-komisioner-kpu,

Pradana, J. (2021, April 6). Transformasi Kewenangan Bawaslu dari Regulasi ke Regulasi.

Romli, H. &. (2004). Pengawasan Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Umum. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian Politik LIPI.

Sukriono, D. (2009). Menggagas sistem pemilihan umum di Indonesia. Konstitusi Jurnal 2.1, 8.

Syarifudin, A. (2020). Implikasi Adanya Upaya Hukum terhadap Putusan Bawaslu tentang Pelanggaran Administratif Pemilu. Cepalo 4.1, 1-14.

Triono. (157). menakar efektivitas pemilu serentak 2019. jurnal wacana politik.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33387/dejure.v5i1.6884

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Creative Commons License

de Jure : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Editorial Official :

De Jure : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum
Faculty of Law, Khairun University.
Jusuf Abdulrahman, Campus II, Gambesi, Ternate City, North Maluku Indonesia.
dejure.hukum@unkhair.ac.id, WhatsApp: +6281343974566