THE ROLE OF ANONYMITY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BASED CHATBOT USAGE BY UNIVERSITY STUDENT AT MEDAN

Randy Brilliant Chandra, Erwin Setiawan Panjaitan, Muhammad Fermi Pasha, Thamrin Thamrin, Robin Robin

Abstract


AI Chatbot is a computer program integrated with artificial intelligence designed to interact with humans and provide useful information. AI Chatbot offers anonymity, one of the factors motivating someone to use it since they feel safe. Indonesian students nowadays inhibit shyness to ask questions and participate in learning due to anxiety factors and fear of negative judgment. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct a test to understand the extent of acceptance factors of AI Chatbots. This research aims to examine the effect of anonymity variable on the use of AI Chatbots among university students at Medan using the UTAUT2 model. A survey was conducted on 421 students. Using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) model with the help of SmartPLS software, this study introduces the anonymity variable in the UTAUT2 model, which has a positive and significant effect on students’ behavioral intention to use AI Chatbots. These findings also show that price value and habit have a positive and significant effect on behavioral intention, also habit and behavioral intention effect students’ behavior towards AI Chatbots at Medan. However, performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and hedonic motivation do not affect the students’ behavioral intention and behavior towards AI Chatbots

References


S. K. S. N. Santosh Maher, “Chatbots & Its Techniques using AI: A Review,” International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, pp. 503-508, 2020.

E. Adamopoulou dan L. Moussiades, “An Overview of Chatbot Technology,” Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations, vol. 584, pp. 373-383, 2020.

A. S. A. A. V. S. A. S. Prof. Prajakta Jadhav, “Intelligent Chatbot,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, pp. 679-683, 2022.

F. J. G.-P. David Fonseca, “Interactive and collaborative technological ecosystems for improving academic motivation and engagement,” Universal Access in the Information Society, p. 423–430, 2019.

A. Tlili, B. Shehata1, M. A. Adarkwah1, A. Bozkurt, D. T. Hickey, R. Huang dan B. Agyemang, “What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 10, no. 15, 2023.

D. Menon dan K. Shilpa, ““Chatting with ChatGPT”: Analyzing the factors influencing users' intention to Use the Open AI's ChatGPT using the UTAUT model,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 11, 2023.

E. Croes dan M. Antheunis, “36 Questions to Loving a Chatbot: Are People Willing to Self-disclose to a Chatbot?,” Chatbot Research and Design, pp. 81-95, 2021.

P. B. Brandtzaeg, M. B. Skjuve, K. K. Dysthe dan A. Folstad, “When the Social Becomes Non-Human: Young People's Perception of Social Support in Chatbots Social Supports in Chatbots,” dalam Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2021.

G. T. Marx, “What's in a Name? Some Reflections on the Sociology of Anonymity,” The Information Society, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 99-112, 1999.

Z. Khawaja dan J.-C. Belisle-Pipon, “Your robot therapist is not your therapist: understanding the role of AI-powered mental health chatbots,” Frontiers in Digital Health, vol. 5, 2023.

N. I. M. Rahim, N. A. Iahad, A. F. Yusof dan M. A. Al-Sharafi, “AI-Based Chatbots Adoption Model for Higher-Education Institutions: A Hybrid PLS-SEM-Neural Network Modelling Approach,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 19, 2022.

Z. Yi dan X. Song, “User Intention of Anonymous Social Application “Soul” in China: Analysis based on an Extended Technology Acceptance Model,” Journal of Theoritical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 2898-2921, 2021.

V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis dan F. D. Davis, “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 425-478, 2003.

V. Venkatesh, J. Y. Thong dan X. Xu, “Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 36, pp. 157-178, 2012.

S. P. Davit Marikyan, Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology: A Review, Bristol: TheoryHub Book, 2023.

Angelia, E. S. Panjaitan dan R. Yunis, “Effect of Attitude on Mobile Banking Acceptance Using Extended UTAUT Model,” Jurnal Mantik, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1006-1013, 2021.

C.-M. Chang, L.-W. Liu, H.-C. Huang dan H.-H. Hsieh, “Factors Influencing Online Hotel Booking: Extending UTAUT2 with Age, Gender, and Experience as Moderators,” Information, vol. 10, no. 9, 2019.

J. A. Charisma dan N. Asnawi, “Memprediksi Niat Perilaku Terhadap E-Wallet: Mengintegrasikan Budaya dalam Kerangka UTAUT2,” Jurnal Perbankan Syariah, vol. II, no. 1, pp. 116-136, 2021.

R. B. Johnson dan L. Christensen, Educational Research: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches, SAGE Publications, 2019.

J. F. d. Winter dan D. Dodou, “Five-Point Likert Items: t test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon (Addendum added October 2012),” Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, vol. 15, no. 11, 2010.

P. D. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta, 2013.

A. Susilowatia, B. Riantob, N. Wijaya dan L. Sanny, “Effects of UTAUT 2 Model on the Use of BCA Mobile Banking in Indonesia,” Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education , vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 686-694, 2021.

G. Dash dan J. Paul, “CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 173, 2021.

M. A. Memona, T. Ramayah, J.-H. Cheah, H. Ting, F. Chuah dan T. H. Cham, “PLS-SEM Statistical Programs: A Review,” Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. i-xiv, 2021.

A. Purwanto dan Y. Sudargini, “Partial Least Squares Structural Squation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Analysis for Social and Management Research : A Literature Review,” Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 114-123, 2021.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33387/jiko.v8i2.9768

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.