PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA APARAT PENEGAK HUKUM ATAS PENUNDAAN PROSES PERADILAN KASUS KORUPSI PT KRAKATAU STEEL

Norma Risca Pratiwi, Ridwan Ridwan, Reine Rofiana

Abstract


In the process of examining the PT Krakatau Steel corruption criminal case, there was a neglect of legal obligations by law enforcement officials regarding the fulfillment of the defendant's rights. The main problem studied in this research is how the process of delays in the criminal justice process for criminal acts of corruption in the PT Krakatau Steel case and what forms of criminal responsibility there are for law enforcement officials for delays in the criminal justice process for criminal acts of corruption in the case of PT Krakatau Steel (Legal Study of District Court Decisions Attack). This research was conducted using normative juridical methods. The results of this research show that in the process of examining the criminal corruption case in the PT Krakatau Steel case, during the evidentiary process at trial, which is part of the prosecution stage in the criminal justice process, there were often delays of up to 7 times by the prosecutor and substitute ad hoc judge. The form of criminal responsibility for law enforcement officials for delays in the criminal justice process for the criminal act of corruption in the PT Krakatau Steel case is the prosecutor and substitute ad hoc judge for their actions in delaying the trial by not obeying statutory orders by officials as a form of contempt of justice (contempt). of court). So that the substitute ad hoc prosecutor and judge can be held criminally responsible under Article 216 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code concerning Crimes Against Public Authorities.

Keywords


Contempt of Court; Criminal Justice System; Criminal Liability.

References


Buku

Adami Chazawi. (2019). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana Bagian I (Stelsel Pidana, Tindak Pidana, Teori-Teori Pemidanaan, dan Batas Berlakunya Hukum Pidana) Cetakan Kedua. Depok: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Agus Rusianto. (2016). Tindak Pidana & Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tinjauan Kritis Melalui Konsistensi antara Asas, Teori dan Penerapannya. Jakarta: Kencana.

Andi Hamzah. (2010). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

___________, (2017). Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika.

___________, (2023). Kejahatan Terhadap Penyelenggaraan Peradilan (Contempt of Court). Bandung: PT. Alumni.

Andi Muhammad Sofyan dan Abd. Asis. (2017). Hukum Acara Pidana Suatu Pengantar Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Kencana.

Christanto. (2023). Yogi Natanael, Kesenjangan Penerapan Pidana Mati dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia. Jawa Barat: CV. Adanu Abimata.

Djoko Sumaryanto. (2019). Buku Ajar Hukum Pidana. Surabaya: Ubhara Press.

Hiariej, Eddy O.S. (2015).Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana (Edisi Revisi). Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Joko Sriwidodo. (2023). Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana. Yogyakarta: Kepel Press.

Manurung, Mangaraja. (2023). Rekonstruksi Kewenangan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Mewujudkan Peradilan yang Sederhana, Cepat dan Biaya Ringan. Indramayu: CV. Adanu Abimata.

Margono. (2019). Asas Keadilan Kemanfaatam &Kepastian Hukum dalam Putusan Hakim. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Masruchin Ruba’i. (2021). Buku Ajar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Media Nusa Creative (MNC).

Muhammad Farid Wajdi, Yang Meliana, dkk. (2023). Pengantar Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jambi: PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

M. Yahya Harahap. (2007). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan. Jakarta: Jakarta Ghalia.

Pakpahan, Novritsar Hasintongan dan Teguh Prasetyo, Pakpahan, Novritsar Hasintongan dan Teguh Prasetyo. (2018). Urgensi Pembaruan Peraturan Persidangan Pidana dalam Perspektif Keadilan Bermartabat. Yogyakarta: K-Media.

Sulistyowati Irianto dan Antonius Cahyadi. (2008). Runtuhnya Sekat Perdata dan Pidana: Studi Peradilan Kasus Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Suyanto. (2018). Pengantar Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Yudi Krismen. (2021). Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Depok: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Jurnal

Gilang Rizki Aji Putra. (2022). “Manusia sebagai Subyek Hukum”, Adalah: Buletin Hukum dan Keadilan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, 6 (1): 29.

Moh Khasan, (2017). “Prinsip-Prinsip Keadilan Hukum dalam Asas Legalitas Hukum Pidana Islam”. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo, 6 (1): 25-26.

Ridwan, (2010). “Upaya Penangulangan Kejahatan Terorisme yang Berkarakteristik Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia”. Jurnal Media Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, 17 (1): 178-179.

Ridwan, Ahmad Lanang Citrawan, dkk. (2022). “Penerapan Prinsip Persamaan di Depan Hukum dalam Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Pengadilan Negeri Serang”, Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro, 51 (2): 174.

Wening Novridasati, Ridwan, dkk. (2020). “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Desk Collector Fintech Ilegal serta Perlindungan terhadap Korban”, Jurnal Litigasi, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pasundan, 21 (2): 246.

Prosiding

Ridwan dan Sariyah, (2019). “Penerapan Nilai-Nilai Hukum Islam pada Proses Pemeriksaan Terdakwa Guna Mengatasi Problematika Disparitas Putusan Hakim dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan Hukum”, Prosiding: Seminar Hukum dan Publikasi Nasional (Serumpun), Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Bangka Belitung, 1 (1).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33387/klj.v8i1.8355

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024



 

Creative Commons License
Khairun Law Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

Editorial Official :

Faculty of Law, Khairun University.
Jusuf Abdulrahman, Campus II, Gambesi, Ternate City, North Maluku Indonesia.
Klj@unkhair.ac.id, WhatsApp: +6281343974566

SUPPORTED BY