KEPEMILIKAN INSTITUSIONAL DAN KONFLIK KEAGENAN DI PASAR MODAL INDONESIA
Abstract
This research aims to test the agency theory in Indonesian capital
market was proxied by the variable mechanism controlling the agency
conflicts, based on institutional ownership. The data used in this study
is secondary data drawn from the Osiris database, ICMD. It is
industrial company, excepted insurance companies and financial
services that meet the criterian sampling and it was listed on the
Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI). The data is in the form of pooled
data with the observation period from the year 2004-2010. Variables
used in this study is that the company's performance to the
performance of utility assets and Tobin's q accounting for market
performance as a proxy for agency conflicts as well as the dependent
variable. As for institutional ownership as independent variables and
firm size as a control variable. The method of analysis used in this
study is multiple regression of pooled data analysis. The results of this
study is an institutional ownership has a positive effect on
performance. That is, institutional ownership having character to
control the agency conflict. With the result that, institutional
ownership has been play function of binding and oversight of agency
conflict.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amihud, Yakov and Murgia, Maurizio. 1997. Dividends, Taxes, and Signaling: Evidence from Germany. The Journal of Finance. Vol. 52, No. 1, pp. 397408.
Ang, James, S., Cole, Rebel A., and James wuh lin. 2000. Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. The Journal of Finance. Vol. 55, No. 1, pp. 81-106.
Baltagi, Badi H. 2005. Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. (3 Edition). John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
Chen, C.R., and T.L. Steiner. 1999. Managerial Ownership, and Agency Conflict: A Nonlinier Simultanous Equation Analysis of Managerial Ownership, risk taking, debt policy, and dividen policy. Financial Review, 34:119137.
Crutchley, Claire E., and Hansen, Robert S. 1989. A Test of the Agency Theory of Managerial Ownership, Corporate Leverage, and Corporate Dividends. Financial Management, Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 36-46.
Crutchley, Claire E., Jensen, Marlin R.H., Jahera, John S., Raymond, Jr., Jennie E. 1999. Agency Problems and The Simultaneity of Financial Decision Making The Role of Institutional Ownership. International Review of Financial Analysis, Vol. 8:2, pp. 177–197.
Dewenter, Kathryn L. and Warther, Vincent A. 1998. Dividends, Asymmetric Information, and Agency Conflicts: Evidence from a Comparison of the Dividend Policies of Japanese and U.S. Firms. The Journal of Finance, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 879-904.
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., 1989. Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 57-74. Gujarati, Damodar N., and Porter, Dawn C. 2009. Basic Econometrics. (5 th Edition). New York: McGrawhill Publisher.
Hanafi, Mamduh M. 2010. Manajemen Keuangan. (Edisi Pertama). Yogyakarta: Penerbit BPFE.
Husnan, S. 2001. Corporate Governance dan Keputusan Pendanaan; Perbandingan Kinerja Perusahaan Dengan Pemegang Saham Pengendali Perusahaan Multinasional dan Bukan Multinasional. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, Manajemen, Ekonomi, Vol 1, No. 1, pp. 1-12.
Isnaini, Nur Fitriana, 2008. Interpendensi Antara Struktur Kepemilikan Institusional, Kebijakan Hutang, Kebijakan Dividen Dalam Menjelaskan Mekanisme Keagenan. Thesis, Tidak dipublikasikan. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Jensen, M.C. 1986. Agency Cost and Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. American Economics Review 76/2, pp. 323-329.
Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, pp. 305-360.
Jensen, G. R., Solberg, D. P., and Zorn, T. S. 1992. Simultaneous Determination of Insider Ownership, Debt, and Dividend Policies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27. 247– 263.
Mahadwartha, P.A. 2003. Predictability Power of Dividend Policy and Leverage Policy To Managerial Ownership: An Agency Theory Prespective. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia, Vol. 18, No.3. pp 288297.
Morck, Randall, Andrei Schleifer, and Robert Vishny, 1988. Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 8: 175-180. Neuman, W. Lawrence. 2006. Social Research Methods:Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. New York: Pearseon.
Prasetyo, T. 2012. Dividen, Hutang dan Kepemilikan Institusional di Pasar Modal Indonesia: Pengujian Teori Keagenan.Tesis, Tidak dipublikasikan. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Tandelilin, E., 2010. Portofolio dan Investasi, Teori dan Aplikasi. (Edisi Pertama). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius..
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33387/jms.v2i1.6661
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Editorial Office: Program Studi Manajemen Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Khairun, Jl. Jusuf Abdulrahman Kotak Pos 53 Gambesi, Kota Ternate, Indonesia.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.