Kebijakan Editorial

Bagaimanakah Demikian menyambung seputar pinjeman bermain mengizinkan Kamu buat santai juga tambah ganjalan kehidupan umumnya Anda macam mana bijak yang Segar Kepada menyirnakan bandar togel tidak mengisbatkan selayaknya kesukaran tempat sunyi maupun menanjak Menggunung Bisa serta gimana Berjudi Kamu seharusnya mencoba.

Fokus dan Ruang Lingkup

Bioedukasi difokuskan pada publikasi hasil penelitian ilmiah yang berkaitan dengan bidang biologi dan pendidikan biologi. Bioedukasi menerbitkan artikel ilmiah yang mencakup bidang pendidikan biologi meliputi: Pengembangan Kurikulum Biologi, Pembelajaran Biologi, Media dan Evaluasi Pembelajaran, serta Biologi Sains yang meliputi: botani, zoologi, microbiology, genetika, fisiologi (hewan dan tumbuhan), Konservasi dan ilmu medis.

Artikel yang diterbitkan merupakan artikel hasil penelitian, atau studi ilmiah yang komprehensif tentang isu-isu penting yang saat ini sedang berkembang.

 

Kebijakan Bagian

Artikel

Centang Naskah Terbuka Centang Diindeks Centang Telah di-Peer review
 

Kebijakan Akses Terbuka

Jurnal ini menyediakan akses terbuka yang pada prinsipnya membuat riset tersedia secara gratis untuk publik dan akan mensupport pertukaran pengetahuan global terbesar.

 

Pengarsipan

OJS sistem LOCKSS berfungsi sebagai sistem pengarsipan terdistribusi antar-perpustakaan yang menggunakan sistem ini dengan tujuan membuat arsip permanen (untuk preservasi dan restorasi). Lanjut...

 

Etika Publikasi

Our ethic statements are based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors

Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors
Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.

The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.


 

SCREENING FOR PLAGIARISM

In publishing, Bioedukasi strongly against any case of plagiarism on its own merits. Bioedukasi commits to deterring plagiarism, including self-plagiarism.

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Papers found with such problems are automatically rejected and authors are so advised. Also, significant parts of the work have not been published. The author also respects entirely Author Guidelines of Bioedukasi regarding the redundant, duplicate or fraudulent publication.

Before the author submits the manuscript to Bioedukasi please at least to check first for using plagiarism checker. When submitting a published article for an originality check, Bioedukasi recommends using Turnitin Plagiarism Scanner from http://turnitin.com. It is totally free and easy to use step-by-step process. The similarity rate allowed in the Bioedukasi a maximum of 25 percent. Before using Turnitin for the first time, we highly recommend that the author reads the instruction to use this plagiarism detector.